Flights to Paris: Was Philippine Airlines Dreaming?

It may have started off as a dream or perhaps Ramon Ang had enjoyed too many sips of San Miguel Beer, but it is now becoming clear that direct flights between the Philippines and France will not be taking off any time soon. In a recent statement, the French Ambassador to the Philippines advised that in spite of a new air service agreement between the two countries, there is an insufficient amount of traffic to make direct flights between France and the Philippines viable. 

Copyright Photo: Angelo Agcamaran/PPSG
According Gilles Garachon, Franch Ambassador to the Philippines, more tourists between the two countries are needed to set up direct flights between Paris and Manila. "The number of French tourists in the Philippines is not enough," said Garachon. "Now that the blacklist of the Philippine Airlines has been lifted, there is nothing preventing having direct flights on both sides." He added that everything is ready for direct flights, but the problem is commercial. "The flights need to be full. If the flights are half empty, companies will lose money," added Garachon.

The news comes as no surprise to industry analysts, particularly the Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation, which referred to Ramon Ang's plan to expand to a number of cities in Europe with direct flights as "overly ambitious." In a report, the aviation think tank had advised Philippine Airlines to ditch Europe and concentrate in the United States, where there is a far less threatening competitive environment and far more Filipinos.

The United States is currently home to more than 3 million Filipinos, compared to less than 700,000 in all of Europe combined. It seemed like an illogical plan at the time when it was first revealed by Ramon Ang given that the former PAL President wanted to fly to the same number of destinations in Europe that the carrier flew to in the United States in spite of the European population of Filipinos being four times smaller than the US. In addition, Philippine Airlines would not have to contend with stiff competition from Gulf carriers and Southeast Asian carriers on US routes.

When the route to London, PAL's first European destination in more than a decade, was eventually launched in November 2013, it did indeed get off to a rocky start with seat loads often less than 50 percent. Before exiting Philippine Airlines, Ramon Ang stated that all of the carrier's routes were profitable except the London route. This realization is likely what caused him to rethink Europe and put the brakes on expansion. 

Jamie Bautista, the returning President of Philippine Airlines, was highly critical of several decisions made by the Ang administration including the acquisition of an excessive number of aircraft, which Bautista said, "lacked deliberation." Bautista is taking a much more sensible approach to expansion in Europe, exploring code-sharing opportunities with new Philippine Airlines partner, Etihad. However, Bautista has noted that the performance of the London flight is beginning to take a turn for the better and hopes to increase frequency to daily flights in the future. 

As far as France is concerned, the French Ambassador revealed that only 50,000 tourists from France are currently visiting the Philippines annually. That is in addition to "almost the same figure" of Filipinos heading to France. Garachon added that this is not enough to establish direct flights in spite of the new air services agreement between the two countries.

In comparison, the Philippines attracted nearly 60,000 visitors from the United Kingdom in the first quarter of 2013. But even with those higher market figures, PAL still struggled initially in London. Philippine Airlines is banking on the convenience of the direct flight to London to boost numbers between the two countries. The United Kingdom is home to one of the ten largest populations of overseas Filipinos with nearly 200,000 residing in the country. It has the largest overseas Filipino population in Europe. 

However, France is still far off the estimated 250,000 round-trip air passengers that travelled between London and Manila in 2012. It is estimated that currently 47,000 and 65,000 Filipinos are presently living in France with as many as 33,000 living in the country illegally. Paris is home to a relatively small Filipino community. 

In spite of that, the French Embassy in the Philippines remains committed to doubling the number of tourists between the two countries through advertisements. "The Philippines has a lot of Asian tourists, but you don't have much western tourists compared to other countries in Southeast Asia," said Garachon. "The planes need to be filled with not only OFW's, but also tourists. There is a huge room for increasing tourism."

27 comments:

  1. Everyone in the right frame of mind saw this a long time ago... except Ramon Ang & the fanboy bloggers in this and other sites!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I AGREE! This is what i've been talking about. Yet, you Filipino punks insist on blaming me for everything. Ramon Ang doesn't know how to run an Airline.

      Delete
  2. If we judge future market performance by past performance, then nothing will happen. It calls to mind an inventor has said in the past - that there's nothing else to invent because everything has been invented. How wrong it is to be in this mindset.

    The problem with projecting future performance using historical data is that just that- you stay stagnant, and that philosophy is so typically 20th century - legacy airline philosophy.

    It comes as a surprise as France continues to sell airplanes to PAL, which obviously is an Airbus fan. If Cebu Pacific worked with this thinking, it would not have supplanted PAL as the biggest domestic carrier. Hell, nobody flies to Qatar, UAE, or Singapore for vacations, most of the passengers are simply passing through.

    PAL is overly concerned about having a market share, when it is so lazy to build, stimulate, and develop the necesaary markets.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One has to be creative and innovative to build and develop the European market to enjoy the windfall accruing to a first mover. Europeans, mostly backpackers, are fond of exotic native beaches which is what the Philippines is all about - a sunny island paradise. The 3-star Philippine Airlines will certainly fit the considerations of a budget-conscious European backpacker if it can work on its pricing, marketing and promotions. Besides, it doesn't have to be a daily flight to Paris, Amsterdam, etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, of course. Anything that makes PAL make some money is acceptable. Besides, once Cebu Pacific has entered the European market, PAL will have a lot of problems.

      Delete
  4. Circa 1980's, Philippine Airlines used to fly its DC-10 aircrafts to Bahrain, Rome, Amsterdam, Zurich and B747 to London. Paris was never included because it is close to London or Amsterdam, so anybody who wants to fly PAL then, would need to commute to the nearest airport where PAL served. Today, that is still the norm. And the strong presence of CX, KE and SQ in Paris is not advantageous to PAL trying to plan to serve that city at this time. But if PAL becomes a low-cost carrier, it can attract more French backpackers and frugal tourists. I flew to Paris last July and saw wide-bodied planes of CX, Air China and SQ parked at CDG Airport. And to see throngs of Chinese shoppers in big department stores and shopping areas in Paris makes me wonder where the real wealth of the world is. "Ming haw"...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ummm... PAL definitely served Paris back then, along with Athens & Frankfurt. In the late 80's, they upgraded to the 747 Classics with stops in Bangkok & Karachi or Abu Dhabi. And when the A340s arrived, it was Manila - Bangkok - De Gaulle 3 x a week until the shutdown in 1998.

      Delete
  5. The market has changed. PAL used to serve all those European destinations, but times were different then. No ME3, and Asian hub & spoke carriers. If there is no market, there is no market. Simple as that. This is not a case of "of you build it they will come". Same reason that BA, LX, AF, LH, AZ, etc pulled out of Manila. BA used to serve every major Australian city & even NZ too. All these people that are saying PAL should innovate, open markets, yadda yadda yadda are romanticists and have no clue whatsoever about free market economics. I'm thankful that you're all just that - amateur bloggers/armchair CEOs because if you were running PAL, it would be six feet under by now. And that was RSA - an egomaniacal idiot who knew nothing about the worldwide aviation industry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are absolutely right! Let's hope PAL can still weather the storm! Time is running out!

      Delete
    2. Maybe they can use Philippine Airlines Express to fly in/out the European backpackers, Filipino expats, Filipino seamen, and transfer passengers.

      Delete
    3. Sorry but you sound so defeatist. pal will never be as great as like SQ, CX, and even the big ME 3 if they continue to feature mediocre services. And no I'm not a rsa fanboy as well.

      Delete
  6. France has all the advantages here. Air France/KLM will again fly Paris/Amsterdam/Dubai/Bangkok/Manila on this particular route, a very profitable market for KLM in the late 70's (I used to fly KLM from Manila to Riyadh via Dubai on my first job and I cannot forget how KLM was so great). Years later, there was a news that the Philippine government reduced KLM services to one flight a week because PAL could not compete neck and neck with KLM (protectionism). Poor KLM, it continued to be patient all these years until it merged with Air France. Now, rosy and profitable years are (again) ahead for the blue bird KLM. But I am sure PAL and Cebu Pacific can compete with KLM at all cost. Let's see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just don't get protectionism to be honest

      Delete
    2. Protectionism is a 1970-1980 government policy making PAL the airline of choice because it was owned and managed by the government.

      Subsequently, PAL was bought and managed by Lucio Tan but PAL performed worst that when the government managed it.

      Maybe because of the deteriorating service of PAL or for some other reasons the other airlines were allowed to open shop making air travel more affordable.

      The government policy has changed from protectionists to pro-consumerism since 1997. The consumers win because they have a wide range of options offered by he competing airlines. The slow and under performing airlines lose.

      Delete
  7. What are you talking about? KLM continues to fly to Manila daily, via Taipei. It used to be nonstop for a few years, first 4 x a week & later increased to daily. Before that, it was 4 x a week via KUL or BKK in the 90's, and before that the multistop service via the mideast. They blamed the common carrier tax why they can't make money with the nonstop service, but in reality it's not that. It's the low-yielding nature of the Philippine market. Doesn't matter how full the flight is. It's all about yield these days, which is why every other European airline pulled out of Manila. Your claim that AF/KL will return one day with their multistop service is laughable. I wish people would learn more about the economics of the industry before making pronouncements like you did. But then this is a public forum where any fool can make predictions & baseless statements. Such is the freedom the internet affords us...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frugal Dutch KLM operated 747-200 for these multi-stop routes and it was popular because the inflight services, punctuality and air fares were excellent. If given the chance, I will fly KLM again and again.

      Delete
    2. @12/3/14 3:36 PM
      Did you not read the news item from one of your Manila newspapers (January, 2014)about the plans of AF/KL flying CDG to Manila via Amsterdam, etc?. Unless you are the CEO of AF/KLM, you can do what you want. And I am not a fool because I am a frequent flier and I can identify which airlines are the real money-makers! Thanks for the insult!

      Delete
    3. Que conducta tan basura. Sin verguenza!

      Delete
    4. Ah Manila newspapers! The world's most reliable news source. Enough said! And u can identify which airlines make money. Obviously u probably got your info from Manila newspapers too. Because you apparently don't know about the financial quagmire of the AF/KL group. I am no CEO, just an erudite citizen who reads the world's most reliable news sources, especially with regards to the airline industry. Do yourself a favour & subscribe to CAPA & other think tanks so u don't look like a bonafide fool!

      Delete
    5. Thank you Mr. Erudite from India or any British colony! You won. I will continue to be a happy American.

      Delete
  8. The reason why KLM remains in the Philippines is because Europe is a financially viable sector. The reason why airlines rationalized their operations before was because of the 2008 Great Recession, now over.

    Maybe it is about time to let the other airlines like Cebu Pacific and Air Asia, etc. fly the entitlements PAL doesn’t like to fly. It would be interesting to see how they can make the Europe sector profitable. They may have a lot of good ideas on how to make it work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Europe has always been viable from all continents around the world. The problem is the Philippine market. Too low yielding to be viable for their carriers. It's the front end of the aircraft that makes money, not the back. And the exodus started long before the 2008 recession. Let's face it, Manila is not a major business centre of the world even though the economy is booming. It's just that the people are "sobrang believe sa sarili".

      Delete
    2. Once upon a time, the planes of SAS, Swissair, Air France, Lufthansa, British Airways, Sabena and KLM crowded the tiny tarmac of the old MIA. And one by one they stopped flying in and they were soon replaced by the airlines of the Middle East. Was the Philippines a viable market before? If so, why or how did it stop being viable? KLM has maintained a strong presence here and at one point supplied technical assistance to PAL. KLM even passed on a number of its DC-8s to PAL, which otherwise would have had no jets during the advent of the jet age.

      Delete
    3. And KLM's first, business and economy classes are really competitive. I remember (circa 1980s) when my Saudi Arabian boss always insisted on flying KLM Business Class everytime he had quarterly trips to Japan (Tokyo) where our product suppliers were from.. He refused to fly First Class on other so-called "national airlines" of countries in the Arabian Gulf and South Asia (which served the Middle East/Japan route). It did not even bother my boss making connections with KLM in Dubai. How loyal!

      Delete
  9. @11:52pm: The name of the game back then was prestige & worldwide reach. Most airlines were state-owned & very much instrumental in their respective countries' development.... which meant they all flew to every far flung corner of the world. Sense or no sense. Today it's all about making money, yield being the key term. The carriers you've mentioned have either gone private or bankrupt, & those that survived have to answer to their shareholders & not the government. Routes that do not contribute ti the bottom line will be dropped, which sadly includes Manila. In hindsight, the ME3 right now are operating just like those old legacy carriers before deregulation & open skies. And despite what they want us to believe, their governments pretty much subsidize their operations, especially fuel. Hardly a level playing field but such is life...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To support your point, even if the carriers answer to the government the shareholders in this case would be taxpayers. Ergo, the carriers will have to answer to taxpayers. And this group of people is now more than ever sensitive about how their money is spent.

      Delete
  10. PAL may actually return to Paris, from their Twitter account:
    https://twitter.com/flyPAL/status/539389057738870785

    ReplyDelete

Powered by Blogger.